To the solutions! Prebiotics found to reduce body fat in overweight children. A new study published in Gastroenterology discussed a possible new tool in. About the Show. As America's most fearless purveyor of "truthiness," Stephen Colbert shines a light on ego-driven punditry, moral hypocrisy and government. Mason McClellan, LAc April 18, 2012. It is hard to get good data on Indonesia and Vietnam but I thought I saw in a WSJ article that their rates of diabetes are going. Have questions about gluten intolerance, a gluten free diet or the foods that help improve brain health? In Grain Brain, Dr. Perlmutter offers suggestions on how to. By Ori Hofmekler. The intermittent fasting approach has been getting increased recognition these days. But 10 years ago, it was a different story. Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy. I was never a big fan of Dr. He’s a smart guy but. Minnesota Mom of Two Diagnosed with Cancer Hours After Husband Dies From ALS: 'I'm Not Ready to Give Into It'. Is sugar toxic? But there are many aspects of surgery that are pure bliss. What keeps them up at night? What are the challenges they face? This is the bliss described by Joseph Campbell. Spending so much time with this group got me thinking about a broader issue, which is actually the focus of this post: Is sugar toxic? What does . Acute toxicity involves harmful effects in an organism through a single or short- term exposure. Subchronic toxicity is the ability of a toxic substance to cause effects for more than one year but less than the lifetime of the exposed organism. Chronic toxicity is the ability of a substance or mixture of substances to cause harmful effects over an extended period, usually upon repeated or continuous exposure, sometimes lasting for the entire life of the exposed organism. The first thing you may notice from this definition is that toxicity is actually subdivided into acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity, based on how long it takes to progress from exposure to insult and the number of exposures necessary to cause insult. Obviously, we don’t do randomized trials of increasing APAP doses in people until we definitively resolve this. Let’s go to step #2. In the figure above, you can see one person lived, despite a dose of 4. Important point #2 – there is a spectrum of susceptibility to any toxin. What about chronic toxicity? Sticking with APAP as our example, it turns out that much lower doses than the LD5. How much lower? Factors such as alcohol consumption, underlying liver disease, viral infections, and genetic susceptibility are highly influential in both acute and chronic toxicity from APAP. On the one hand, folks like Dr. Rob Lustig have argued that fructose is harmful at the doses most people are consuming it today. James Rippe have argued the opposite. In other words, it has no unique metabolically harmful consequence. Depending on affiliation, some of the PRO sugar folks debate back and forth about the advantages or disadvantages of sucrose (natural sugar from beets, cane, etc. To a first or second order approximation, they are biochemically equivalent.) It appears this debate is a convenient way to avoid really confronting question/point #1. The toxicity of sugar, they argue, is primarily related to its hepatic metabolism. These data are sometimes confounded, as are many data in this area, by the use of pure fructose, rather than the glucose- fructose mixture found in sugar. So, while folks in this camp argue that sugar per se isn’t harmful, it does make you eat more (sugar and non- sugar, alike), and that is the harm. Perhaps the largest debate in this area stems from the dose issue. In other words, while the overall trend in sugar data is determined by availability data (since % loss is assumed to be constant over time), the absolute amount consumed on any given year, as estimated by these loss- adjusted numbers, is entirely dependent on this RTI loss estimate which, for added sugars, is almost entirely dependent on an expert’s estimation. James Rippe (one of the leading proponents of sugar) noted the following: “. Rippe’s CV on his website.**Sadly, it’s difficult to really interpret the data objectively from those in the PRO sugar camp because of the conflicts of interest. Is oxygen toxic? These are equally silly questions, I hope you’ll appreciate. Ever wonder why “only” about one in six smokers dies of small cell lung cancer? Maybe it’s the same reason some people (e. Jill, my wife) can mainline the stuff and not appear to suffer many adverse effects. I posit that Jill and I are both outliers on the distribution of susceptibility, probably driven mostly by genetic difference (rather than, say, exercise as we both exercise a lot). But I hope this slightly more nuanced response can help you figure out what you should be asking: Are you like me? Or like an Average Joe somewhere in between us? This is what you will need to figure out on your own. But, it’s actually possible to find foods that contain minimal to zero added sugar. With this information in hand, begin the intervention: aim for a reduction of at least 5. I’ve written about this previously. She claimed to be absolutely full, and I believed it. Until then, we’ll save the chocolate broth for special (and not too common) treats. So, in response to the question, “Is sugar toxic?” it seems to me the answer is, “yes, sugar is probably chronically toxic to many people.” And so is water. And so is oxygen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2017
Categories |